MKLC Training Logo

I was rather flattered by the tutor's responses to my work, however, I thought the compliments reflected dumbed-down educational standards rather than the quality of my submissions. When I first commenced sending drafts to the tutor, I had forgotten that the assessment would appear on the website, so I don't know what the response time was at that point. Once I began to check for responses on the website, though, I was dismayed by the length of time it took to mark the work. Latterly, the delay was more than two weeks, but the promises to mark work by a specified day - targets that were not delivered- increased the frustration. When I communicated with the office, this problem was dealt with most efficiently and with good grace. – How would you describe our performance overall?

  • 7/10 – How easy was your enrolment process?
  • 6/10 – How would you rate the accessibility and ease of use of our Moodle site?
  • 5/10 – How would you rate your tutor support?
  • 6/10 – Overall, how satisfied were you with the quality of the service we provided?
  • 5/10 – How likely is it that you would recommend us to a friend or colleague?

01 Jul 22

Person’s avatar

We are glad you felt you were tested in this course and sorry you did not feel the quality of your submissions was adequately acknowledged. Unfortunately, the assessment is based on whether your work meets specified criteria, which are the standards set by the awarding organisation.
As soon as we were aware there was a delay in work being marked, we dealt with it immediately. This was due to unforeseen circumstances but tutors and students have now been asked to inform us directly if work is not marked within 48 hours. We understand it can be frustrating if you have to wait for any feedback and we want all students to have a positive learning experience with us.

Judith McKeon –